| 10:30
29th October 2006 |
Competition: |
League |
Away |
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Glade U16 |
6 |
Howe Street |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howe Street mowed down. |
|
|
This game
took a long time to come to life as both teams struggled with
the surface. Forest, spoilt by the surface at Barleylands,
struggled the most as the long grass and weeds slowed their
passing game almost to walking pace. Asa Dengel in the opening
minutes was set free by a good pass from the midfield but was
tackled not by a Howe Street defender but by a large clump of
long grass. This led to the opening minutes being very
disjointed and the ball spending far too long in the air for
Forest to make any meaningful chances. Even so, it was obvious
from the opening salvos that Forest had the better technical
ability. The only problem, as with all of the games so far this
season, was that Forest’s work rate was low and this kept Howe
Street in the game. |
|
|
Eventually
however the pace of the Forest team began to tell and the work
rate increased. In the 13th minute an attempted
clearance by a Howe Street defender was blocked just inside the
Howe Street half. The ball ballooned up but it looked likely
that the Howe Street keeper was going to catch the ball on the
edge of his own area. However Asa Dengel chased the ball down
and his speed caught the keeper out just reaching the ball
before him and lobbing the ball over the keeper. Asa thought he
had scored but the ball took an odd bounce and hit the post. The
ball bounced back into the six yard box and right to Conor
Bartrip who drilled the ball past the Howe Street defenders and
into the net for the opening goal. |
|
|
This was the
first time Forest had led in a game all season and could and
should have been the catalyst for a strong half. However Forest
failed to lift their game and this led to Howe Street keeping
hope that they could still get a result out of the game. Forest
did go close when after a scrappy move the ball fell to Grant
Cumming on the penalty spot. His right footed shot went fizzing
past the top right hand corner of the goal. |
|
|
Then Howe
Street came very close to equalising when some indecisive Forest
defending let the Howe Street right winger have a shot at goal
which was cleared over the bar by Alex Chapman. |
|
|
It wasn’t all Forest however and Elliott was called into action
again when Baddow played a ball over the top of the Forest
defence. With the Baddow striker bearing down on his goal,
Elliott stood tall and big and when the shot came, he deflected
it wide for a corner. |
|
|
Forest
struggled on the surface to create any meaningful chances but
Tom Bailey did have a powerful strike on goal from 30 yards
which had everyone including the keeper thinking it was in, but
it just went past the left post. |
|
|
Some hard
talking at half time to the Forest players highlighted the first
half flaws. The team was not pressurising the Howe Street
players and were allowing the easy pass too often. Forest, in
the first half, also often tried to play the difficult pass when
the simple game would have worked better especially on the poor
pitch. Communication was also lacking with the team far too
quiet. |
|
|
Straight
away in the second half the Forest players set about correcting
the flaws from the first. Some good pressure on the Howe Street
left full back resulted in a Forest throw deep into the Howe
Street half. Nathan Clarke took the throw towards Jack Douglas
on the edge of the area. He let the ball run across him and then
Tom Barley demanded that Jack leave the ball. Tom’s shot was
slightly scuffed but was met at the far post by Conor again to
easily tap home his and Forest’s second goal. |
|
|
Forest’s
confidence grew and they began to play the kind of football that
all the supporters and management know they are capable of. On
the 45th minute a sweeping move from front to back
down the Forest right saw Alan Pratt play a one-two with Nathan
Clarke which saw Nathan away from the Howe Street defence. Again
the slow pitch allowed the Howe Street defender to get back but
Nathan skilfully stepped inside the defender at the byeline. He
then crossed perfectly to an unmarked Grant Cumming in the
centre of the goal who powerfully headed into the corner of the
net. It was a superb goal that epitomised everything that the
team can do well and the Howe Street players had no chance to
defend this kind of play. |
|
|
Forest were
now on top and on the 49th minute Tom Barley had
another superb strike at goal that just went wide after being
simply set-up by his team mates. |
|
|
3-0 up
Forest were now cruising and for once the luck was also
beginning to go their way. The fourth goal came from a bad
corner from Jack Hawthorn that was deflected into his own goal
by a Howe Street defender at the near post. |
|
|
Just 2
minutes later Forest again were pressurising the Howe Street
defenders and Tom Barley won the ball 30 yards out. This time he
didn’t strike the ball as cleanly as before and the ball looped
up into air but beat the keeper at the far post. A slightly
fortuitous goal but probably deserved after the earlier strikes
had just missed. |
|
|
The Forest
domination was antagonising and frustrating the Howe Street
players and they began to lose their composure. To their
continual credit the Forest players did not react even when the
provocation was severe. |
|
|
With 10
minutes to go Nathan was again set free down the right wing.
This time he cut into the goal area and in front of the Howe
Street defender. In desperation the Howe Street player tried to
get back closer to Nathan but ended up bundling Nathan over from
behind and the referee had no alternative but point to the spot
for a penalty. Jack Hawthorn took the spot kick and although it
was not his best strike the keeper was now totally disillusioned
and easily beaten. |
|
|
At 6-0 the
game was totally finished apart from Forest’s desire to keep a
clean sheet. The defence had had a mainly very strong game,
after some occasional lapses in concentration in the first half.
The strength of the defence in this game came from a very
dominant goalkeeping performance from Elliott Thwaites. His
concentration this week was superb and he gave the defence the
confidence to use him as a sweeper on a short pitch. He
continually commanded his goal area with clear and loud calls.
This is therefore an odd situation where a team wins 6-0,
defends so well that the opposition has few meaningful strikes
on goal, and the goalkeeper is awarded the Man-of-the-match
award. In this case it is wholly justified. |
|
|
|
|
|
Man of the Match
:
Elliott Thwaites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|